EU: Amazon is a 'very large online platform'
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has rejected Amazon’s legal objection to the designation of the Amazon Store as a ‘very large online platform’ pursuant to the Digital Services Act (DSA). As a result, Amazon is required to adhere to more rigorous regulations established by the European Union.
The European Commission has designated the Amazon Store as a ‘very large online platform’ in accordance with the Digital Services Act, reflecting its user base exceeding 45 million within the European Union.
Major online platforms are subject to comprehensive regulatory responsibilities
This classification imposes transparency requirements and data access rights for researchers, along with additional obligations. Amazon initiated legal proceedings to annul both the classification and its associated obligations, asserting that these measures infringe upon several fundamental rights, including entrepreneurial freedom, property rights, equality before the law, freedom of expression and information, and the protection of confidential data.
Validity of the DSA regulatory measures confirmed
The General Court rejected all aspects of the case. It first stated that, although the DSA’s requirements do place limits on business freedom, these restrictions are reasonable and serve the important purpose of reducing the systemic risks created by large platforms. Lawmakers also have significant flexibility in addressing dangers like the spread of illegal content or violations of fundamental rights.
Secondly, the ruling determined that interference with property rights was considered an administrative burden and was therefore permissible. The court concluded that classifying entities based on user numbers was equitable and not arbitrary, thereby maintaining the principle of equality. Furthermore, limitations imposed on freedom of expression and information—such as the requirement to provide recommendations without the use of profiling—were found to be reasonable and proportionate.
Press release No. 144/25 on ECJ T-367/23 (19 November 2025)