Austrian OGH: Annulment of Compulsory-Auction Bid Award

Benn-Ibler Rechtsanwälte

award  compulsory sale  depreciation  highest bid  All tags

The Austrian Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof, hereinafter OGH) has recently considered the question of whether the cancellation of a successful bid at a compulsory auction can be sought on the grounds of unknown defects in the property being auctioned.

In the case in question, the purchaser was legally awarded a building at a compulsory auction on February 10, 2025, for the highest bid of EUR 304,000. The valuation report determined its market value to be EUR 608,000. On July 7, 2025, the purchaser formally requested that the award be vacated, citing the decline in the property‘s condition since the valuation date.

OGH highlights legal loophole

In the event that a significant reduction in value occurs between the submission of the highest bid and the award of the lot at auction, the OGH has already ruled in Case 3 Ob 158/88 that maintaining the purchaser‘s obligations unchanged would amount to binding the purchaser to a highest bid that they had submitted under circumstances different from those that subsequently arise. In such a case, the need to adjust their obligations is particularly clear. The law contains a genuine loophole in this regard. While such a purchaser cannot seek a reduction in the highest bid, they do have the option of requesting that the award be set aside.

Amendment to the 2014 Enforcement Regulations (EO)

The November 2014 amendment to the Austrian EO established a provision entitled Cancellation of the Award (Section 187a) within the EO. This provision stipulates that in certain circumstances, specifically those pertaining to legal incapacity, the right to apply for the cancellation of a property award resides exclusively with the obligated party. It is important to note that the introduction of this right does not preclude the possibility of an application for annulment in other situations.

Expired deadline

However, the question of whether, in the present case, a right to rescind the award exists where a significant reduction in value has occurred between the reference date for the valuation—the date on which the survey was carried out—and the submission of the highest bid, can be left open here, as the purchaser‘s application for rescission was, in any event, submitted out of time. The application to set aside the award must be submitted within three months of the auction date.

OGH 3 At 77/26h (23 June 23 2026)




More Services